POLAND'S foreign minister Radek Sikorski [full disclosure: an old friend of mine] has just been in Israel, where he gave an interesting interview to the Haaretz daily. It was interesting for three reasons: for what he said, for the questions asked, and for the comments. These give a vivid snapshot of the furious emotions still swirling around the issue of the Holocaust in Nazi German-occupied Poland. For some in Israel, the Poles still are loathesome Nazi accomplices. For most Poles, the mass murder of Jews was part of a wider and grimmer picture of totalitarian regimes acting in a destructive frenzy of aggression. Here is an excerpt of the interview, with comments from me in square brackets:
What is the meaning of the phenomenal renewal of Jewish culture in Poland today? Should we really accept the thesis, heard more and more, that Poland is a philo-Semitic country nowadays? [this an interesting reversal of the usual thesis that Poles imbibe anti-semitism with their mother's milk]
"I am surprised at your surprise. The fact that a large portion of the world's Jews lived in Poland before the Holocaust needs to be taken into account. For generations, Poland absorbed Jews while they were expelled from other countries. [good point for Poland to make about Germany and Russia] The Holocaust that took place on our soil was conducted against our will by someone else. So what is happening now is simply that free Poland is returning to its natural self."Before coming to Israel, I reviewed statistics about anti-Semitism worldwide, and was proud to discover that the number of anti-Semitic incidents in Poland was minuscule in comparison to most western European nations and the United States. And furthermore, it has been more than half a century since a murder with an anti-Semitic context has taken place in Poland. Poland is today renewing its tradition of tolerance and we are proud of this."
What is your opinion of the debate taking place now in Poland about what is known as the "third phase of the Holocaust," and books such as Jan Gross' "Golden Harvest" (set for release later this year ) about Poles who robbed Jewish property during and after the Holocaust? Does this testify to a new wave of self-examination in your country? [the Jan Gross book is a huge hot potato in Poland. His previous books dealt with a wartime pogrom at Jedwabne, and the post-war killings of Holocaust survivors at Kielce]
"I have a principle not to comment on texts that I have not read, but the last time I checked the definition of the Holocaust, it was said to be a phenomenon in which a state uses industrial methods to eradicate an entire ethnic group. Horrendous events took place in Poland; there were periods during the Holocaust when people behaved heroically and others behaved like scum, but the Holocaust was the creation of the German state. We mustn't be confused about that."
There is an ongoing debate in Israel about high school students' trips to death camps in Poland, with critics claiming these visits lead to radical nationalism among pupils. In Poland, criticism is directed at the focus on the camps, and the absence of emphasis on modern Poland and a thousand years of shared history. What is your take on these issues?
"Our two peoples experienced hell in the 20th century and [we] have not yet managed to heal [our] wounds. We visit Katyn in Russia to honor our dead [where more than 20,000 Polish officers and senior government officials were murdered in 1940 at Stalin's orders], and you come to Poland because the Nazis chose our land to commit their grisly crimes. [interesting link of Jewish suffering at German hands and Polish suffering at Soviet hands]
"One of the reasons we are in Israel is to reshape these visits. We would like them to emphasize the identity of the perpetrators and the victims of the Holocaust, so that the younger generation will not receive mistaken ideas about them. We also want young people to absorb the sense of modern Poland, tolerant and prosperous, in order to deepen understanding of the positive aspects of our relations. We would like to be seen as a place where one can live, not only die. [gentle criticism of Israeli polonophobia here]
"In the past I visited an air base in northern Israel, and saw a very well done documentary about a flypast of Israeli pilots over Auschwitz - a wonderful statement of victory over evil. But we want to ensure that the next generation of Israeli pilots knows who built Auschwitz and who operated it. Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu has promised me that such documentary films will correctly emphasize the facts." [please stop distorting our history]
This week's Economist has an article on a related theme, highlighting the popularity in Poland of the Chief Rabbi, Michael Schudrich.
One success Mr Schudrich cites is Poland's rigorous investigation of a pogrom in 1941 in Jedwabne (now marked by an official apology from the country's president). Another was more personal. In 2006 he was punched by a skinhead (he hit back). The attack brought condemnation from media and politicians alike: the thug was seen as the outsider, not the rabbi. Behind the scenes, Mr Schudrich works hard to rebut simplistic outside judgments, as in 2009, when Britain's Labour Party tried to brand the Polish allies of their opponents, the Conservatives, as anti-Semites
Again, the vituperative comments are revealing, including one reader who says that because the Economist is run by Jews, it won't tell the "truth" about communism. Given that we are probably the most dyed-in-the-wool cold warriors you could find in the mainstream media, and devoted a cover to Ronald Reagan when he died, headlined "The Man who beat Communism" I find that quite odd.
This week's European Voice column on the region highlights Poland's potential clout in the wider Middle East.
Arabic-language material on Poland is scanty: Wikipedia has no entry for Poland's ‘Takaful' movement (the rough equivalent of ‘Solidarity').
Yet Poland's credentials are impressive. It is the only big country in the ex-communist world that has a functioning system of law-governed political freedom (‘democracy' in shorthand). Russia, and now (sadly) Ukraine do not count. And Poland is one of the Big Six in the EU. Its heavyweight political leadership easily commands high-level attention.
Second, it has ‘street cred'. This is a country where mass protest, with a strong religious element, beat down an elderly military leadership that was trying to sustain an economically failing authoritarian regime. Some of Poland's leading figures (in both the main parties) were movers and shakers in those days too: they shook the system and moved Poland out from captivity into freedom.
Third, the leaders of Solidarity (unlike some counterparts elsewhere) made the most of their victory once they won it. They did not adopt a vindictive winner-takes-all approach (in retrospect, some think they were too soft on the old nomenklatura, but I think that minimising the risk of bloodshed by allowing some room for the losers was the right decision). Poles know how to organise a round table; how to deal with an over-mighty intelligence service or armed forces loyal to the old days; how to carry out economic reform; and how to turn a monolithic mass pro-democracy movement into a multi-party political system.
Fourth, the Polish leadership knows all too well how weak-kneed, lily-livered and hypocritical west European politicians can be. While the Poles were struggling to regain their geopolitical birthright as a sovereign state in the heart of Europe, politicians in Brussels, Paris, Bonn and London were worried about ‘stability'. If the dependable old commies left the stage, maybe ‘radicals' would take their place. In the West, people conjured up all sorts of ghosts from the past (and from their own imagination), ranging from ultra-nationalists and anti-Semites to strike-crazy syndicalists and (contradictorily) even rip-roaring low-cost capitalists who might disrupt the cosy world of west European business.
When Mr Sikorski has sorted out Polish-Jewish relations, perhaps he could put this issue on his to-do list too.



Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
So many amazing female heroines of WWII. Poland's Irena Sendler was truly astounding in her accomplishments. Personally helped 2,500 Jewish children escape the torment of Nazi persecution.
Read about her and other female heroine's of WWII: http://doncarina.com/HeroinesWWII.html
There will always be ignorant people on the Polish Catholic and Polish Jewish side just as there are many intellegent people. People will be people with myths and stereo types propogated on both sides. No society escapes this. Look at Israel and their attitude to Russian Jews (good enough to fight for Israel but not good enough to be burried in a Jewish cemetary becasue their blood is not pure enough)
Most people just want a normal peaceful life and do not care much for petty politics or lunatics who propogate hate (usually scared little boys who have nothing much to offer the world).
@ mikeinwarsaw
Radek still has a long way to go... Remember his 'I'm not going to Wilno till they continue to violate Polish minority rights' (the quote in essence, not literally)? He occasionaly reminds me of Dmitry Rogozin, in substance if not style.
Minister Radek Sikorski is evidently beginning to mature and grow up and move towards the political centre from the rabid Right. His formerly "Bush-like" pronouncements have ceased. What's caused that? The experience of service in Kaczynski's administration back in 2005 and the daily grind of diplomacy and its necessary healthy compromises after 2007 as against earlier near hysterical sabre rattling?
Ref Israel, I just wish the Israelis could wind the clock back to the days of the late 1960's. But that's not possible. Israel has changed dramatically in the meantime, all too often not for the better....
@Cheesus Crust
Well, it is not your first attempt to start a conversation with me about something, please continue - one day it might actually happen.
Unfortunatelly, please forgive my arrogance, but it might require more effort, a lot of time and certain amounts of money spent on necessary literature.
That is what I am doing when preparing to discuss a subject, enter a competition or present a case.
As you know narrow-minded and provincial nationalism straight from the XIXth century is THE poison still affecting relations between some nations.
And which - as events such as the results of the last municipal elections in Lithuania prove according to 'Lietuvos Rytas' - is also politically counterproductive.
I am certain as a devoted patriot you are already working on something like this so I will no longer disturb your precious spare time to enlighten small but diverse community of readers of this blog.
Mr. Sikorski will sort out Polish-Jewish relations in the same manner he did it with Poland's eastern neighbours. I will not use the proper words as I've been warned to be more carefull with my wording. Well, Oxford dictionary advices (http://bit.ly/eBmaxthe) Mr.Skiroski will "do something badly or ineptly" with Polish-Jewish relations.
What I have observed myself, Poles begin to master politically correct facade, but under thin layer of it most of them still remain outrageous chauvinists and Jew haters.
@cegorach
>>Our area of expertise is still Eastern Europe and very few deny that we are the most competent country to talk about Belorus or Ukraine.
Well, great comment. It keeps me smiling for 3 hours already. May be we will get some comments about this statement from Ukrainians or Belorus?
I think everyone is pretty clear that it was the Germans who committed the crimes at Auschitz and other Polish locations. I would assume that most people in the west are ignorant about Poland's history of anti-semitism and consider them mere bystanders to the Holocaust. The Polish minister sounds surprisingly defensive about it at the end of the interview. Chill.
I wouldn't overestimate this current philo-Semitism. True, you may see crowds in the Jewish culture festivals [come to Warsaw to see the nuns dancing to the Jewish klezmer music in Próżna festival :-) ]. Yes, you may see a lot of people aware of the common past and making true gestures about it. But yes, you may also see a Star of David painted on the walls in a shameful way, and yes, you may hear people accusing politicians of all the evils, and including Jewishness as such obvious evil.
I suppose, that Poland has turned out to be not as bad as it was portrayed for decades and hence the surprise. Just read the comments from the Jewish under this Haaretz interview. The truth is complex and not easy to be generalised. But still, there is a long way to the Polish-Jewish paradise.
And besides, we are still rather a weak country. Our GNP per capita is among the lowest in EU, yes - it has been growing last 20 years much better than others had predicted, but it will take another generation or two before it is on a par with that of countries like Netherlands, Italy or even Spain. I would prefer my government e.g. to improve railways over here rather than look for prestigious but costly diplomatic successes in Middle East. It is not an area where we have any expertise, so a failure is much more probable than a success.
To understand what happened in the Eastern Europe, and to get a broader picture not limited to the holocaust perspective, Norman Davies' as well as Timothy Snyder's works should be a mandatory reading in the curriculum of the Western universities, and not only in some highly specialised history courses. Since WWII, throughout the Cold War and up till now, the holocaust has been the only narrative from these bloodlands known in the West. Anti-semitic Poland is just a part of that limited narrative. Sikorsky's point of Poland being a philo-Semitic country nowadays hits the nail on its head. To be precise, the meaning of 'nowadays' needs further elaboration, but that is another issue.
Reading the interview was interesting. Reading comments under the article - less, but expectable and overall positive because reasonable comments were accepted by a larger group of readers. That tells something about present relations with the Jewish community, also... "more radical" in the United States.
I certainly agree that if the relations are positive it is nothing new, more like returning to default stance.
Ironically Poland can claim it was the first ally of Israel because of its support to Zionist fighters (or terrorists) who were given training in guerilla warfare in 1936-39 in camps in south-east Poland or the weaponry (including first few aircrafts) smuggled to Palestine.
Mentioning Jan Gross was predictable since his latest book will be released soon (and in the USA in the summer) - despite controversy his works have huge and positive impact on studies about the subject of Holocaust in Poland, participation of local population and similar.This way more detailed studies are given more interest - how much of aggression against Jews was caused by greed, anti-Semitism, criminal activities, powerty, starvation, terror etc. This subject should be cleared of all the usual myths, legends, misconceptions and even nonsense.
When it comes to the Arab revolutions however I believe it will be difficult challenge for the Polish government,
First of all we are (as a country) still rather weak when it comes to directing the entire EU towards one or another solution or just certain stance. Our area of expertise is still Eastern Europe and very few deny that we are the most competent country to talk about Belorus or Ukraine.
Arab world despite some, sporadic contacts seems very distant, very exotic and difficult to understand. More than that Polish public opinion sees it this way and involvement of the government might cost it. Especially with the current level of tabloidisation our media represent i.e. the mockery Prime Minister Donald Tusk experienced for the trip to Southern America a couple of years ago.
I doubt that our lovely opposition will appreciate it either, though maybe in this case it is better they remained silent, but will they - in the general election year?
I also doubt that former colonial powers will respond nicely - to them it will be like violating something still subconciously 'theirs'.
Overall it will be a tough challenge, but in a couple of months when Poland replaces Hungary at the head of the EU something will have to be done. Perhaps a summit of leading intellectuals at least showing the rebells that we care and will support their new governments - just like one of my most favourite bloggers Wojtek Orliński proposed recently - under the slogan 'Join the Club'?
Very, very hard challenge and little time to act in area known to the most of Poles as a holiday destination or as little more than Tierra Incognita.
Regards Cegorach
P.S. Ukraine (but also and more worringly Belorus) could be considered Poland's colony for a long time. Maybe there is also something to build from this experience - if western former colonial powers are willing to use something from this experience.
In reading this article it comes to my mind that from ancient times the bedrock of Polish society has had a strong religious influence Poland defended Europe against the saracen during a fight in Austria and prevented them from conquering eastern europe. This religious influence can be seen today by the toleration and friendship with the Jewish people who are one of the main religions. Todays world could once again be rocked by an aggressive push by groups not being ready to tolerate other groups. May we be on guard and prepared to defend ourselves from foreign conquerers. The revolts we see now may end up to be more totalitarism of the Iran variety and not democracies. What we can be sure of is the world is being shaken and shaken and what was true before is no longer true and we must walk carefully and be prepared for the future by the resolve to defend our freedoms.
At length the world may have discovered what Poland is.
On the other hand, with some of his precariously combative p’s and q’s on other issues such as Belarus and Lithuania I regard our Radek (though I am not Polish), who converted from the Bar Confederation to the Patriotic Party only a few years ago, to be still an apprentice to his moderate seniors like our Wronek, Donald, Adam Michnik, and the living legend Wladyslaw Bartoszewski. He is, however, still young enough to take time to train himself to become a great leader in the future. A technically able figure like him tends to become excessively self-sufficient for a national leader (e.g. Hillary Clinton), which is the very point he should overcome. Otherwise, his lifelong ambition will only have to end up with bitter compromises. Our Wronek and Donald are certainly great leaders because they know the fact very well that many among their peers are superior to them as specialists in the respective fields and at the same time flatter themselves that they are never inferior to the others as generalists. I may hope that a number of more able specialist figures than Radek will come and join in the moderate party, because I honestly want him to become a respected leader who firmly succeeds the legacy of moderatism as the mainstream social philosophy of Poland.
As for what we may regard revolutions in the Middle East, we need as the very first thing of all to recognise that a Polish help or support couldn’t on its own guarantee democratisations in the Arabic states. It is no other than autonomous and spontaneous efforts of the Arabic nations themselves that should create and try to incubate their own moderates who as the social cores take the initiative of the process of socio-political transition. Without such groups (as both subjects for the Arabs themselves and objects in view of the Poles at the same time) Poles could not ever offer any meaningful form of help or support to the peoples there. With no such collective will and tangible efforts on the side of those nations, people throughout the world, who have only fragmentary or superficial knowledge of the history of Poland, may hastily conclude that the Polish moderatism has been proven to be an utter fake when the Arabs should fail to establish respective democracies. In that case people may – albeit wrongly – feel disillusioned at the value of moderatism again to prefer the brutal forces of radicalism such as populism, libertarianism and – less harmfully – socialism. Therefore, if they wish to help or support the Arabs the Poles should first of all strictly distinguish real moderates from self-professed moderates amongst the social groups there. Regrettably, I personally predict that there will soon be bitter conflicts between conventional populists – such as Islamic fundamentalists and nationalists – and libertarians as new populists led by liberals among intellectuals for the initiative of each ‘revolution’ and that the former may eventually prevail as other fresh forms of dictatorship in the respective states. The Poles were able to – I dare add ‘very easily’ – democratise their society after 1989 due to the centuries of empirical accumulation of the essential factors of democracy, which the Arabs simply lack. The Arabs might possibly need some more historical struggles as the necessary-evil for such empirical accumulation, or the ideological pendulum of each society will swing back towards the wrong side with a correspondingly stronger moment. (I now recall that Zbigniew Brzezinski was suggesting something similar to my pessimism – citing the imbalance between the progressive expansion of civil rights and the gradual emergence of the rule of law and calling the American efforts to promote democracy ‘short-sighted’ – in his 2008 book ‘Second Chance’ in the section on the issue of what he called the Global Balkans. He may have been thinking of the Polish neo-con projects adopted by King Zygmunt III Vasa to the Muscovites and by Jozef Pilsudski to Poland’s pre-war eastern neighbours). It is hastiness that could ruin all the past efforts of construction.