Mapping the world's Jewish population and migration patterns
JUDAISM is enjoying an unexpected revival, according to a special report to be published in this week’s Economist. The map and chart below show where the biggest Jewish populations live and how this has changed over the past century. In 1939, Jews numbered 16.5m people, up from 10.6m in 1900. By the end of the second world war, the Nazis had wiped out one-third of them, sweeping away a thousand years of Jewish civilisation in central and eastern Europe. The death toll might have been even higher, but a flurry of pogroms that started 60 years earlier across the then-tsarist empire had sent waves of Jewish emigrants westward. By the time Hitler struck, some 6m Jews were safe in North and South America and in Britain, with 3m more living in the Soviet Union. From 1948, most of the Jews of north Africa and the Levant emigrated. The break-up of the Soviet Union brought the latest big wave of Jewish migration to Israel in the early 1990s.



Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
Dear gfromaz
Partial facts are worse than lies. I am not writing for you, because logical and factual discussion may be lost on you, but to place a response in writing to your statements, so that an innocent reader will have a way to see, and maybe check for themselves. Wikipedia, Britannica are all good places to start.
Khazars were indeed a great kingdom at some point, and their leaders accepted Judaism at some point. However, the Jews of eastern europe descend from a relatively small group of German Jews migrating east. Their last names are often germanized, or bear the name of a town in germany. These are called Ashkenazi jews - Ashkenaz is Germany in Hebrew. The founder population was small, and this lead to many genetic conditions ony present in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Tay-Zachs disease, Neimann-Pick, and familial dystonia are just some conditions caused by a small founder population and genetic isolation.
Regarding viewing the land of Israel as homeland by the Jews of Spain - you probably read of the greatest of the Sephardic (spanish) Jews - Maimonides who is buried in Tiberias, though he worked as a physician in the court of Egypt. Jews from Spain indeed settled in the land of Israel - Palestine, after the exile. Many died out over the following centuries. However, some of those living in Palestine created some of the most important jewish religious books. Most of them lived in Safed and Tiberias, both holy cities in Judaism. Joseph Karo wrote the Shulhan Aruch there in the 16th century - the most conprehensive collection and commentary on Jewsih religious law to this day.
Palestine over the centries was a poor hinterland, suffering from frequent wars (even after the crusades and after the Turkish invasion). The population was not large, and cities like Tberias and Safed were devastated by earthquakes in the 19th century, as well as by diseases.
Reading the Wikipedia pages on those cities is edifying.
Ultimately, gfromaz, you will not be convinced now, but maybe one day you will visit Israel, and maybe one day you will change your mind.
Because for peace, you do not need to build an elaborate system of denying that the other side has rights. You simply need to want peace, and love life.
Mabruk.
In the Bible, in the book of Ezekiel 36:20-23 God reveals the reason why despite the people of Israel were dispersed to many parts of the world , God has never left their identity as ISRAEL be erased 20 And wherever they went among the nations they profaned my holy name, for it was said of them, ‘These are the Lord’s people, and yet they had to leave his land.’ 21 I had concern for my holy name, which the people of Israel profaned among the nations where they had gone.
22 “Therefore say to the Israelites, ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: It is not for your sake, people of Israel, that I am going to do these things, but for the sake of my holy name, which you have profaned among the nations where you have gone. 23 I will show the holiness of my great name, which has been profaned among the nations, the name you have profaned among them. Then the nations will know that I am the Lord, declares the Sovereign Lord, when I am proved holy through you before their eyes.
God says that its not because of the people of Israel that He protects them but because of His great name. You will know what God meant if you now know His true Name in the Bible- visit www.thename.ph and know the real name of God of Israel and may the jewish people realize why God saved them before and if God will still save them from their enemies if they do not acknowledge His one,great, and true Name. Read www.thename.ph now
Teraz nawet nie ma Polski na tej mapie...
Apparently the settlers in the West Bank were counted as living in Israel.
although the land they occupy is not formally part of the Israeli state both abroad as also by israeli law, they are citizens of the state so they are counted as "jews in Israel".
More Jews lived in 'Palestine' at the turn of the century than did Arabs.This is not reflected in the graph.
Really?! Where did you read that? There was minor Jewish presence in Palestine from the end of the Roman era until well into the 20th century. Show us where in Jewish history the Ottoman invasion of the 16th century is mentioned.
Palestinians were called that by the Romans as well as the invading Turks.
Palestinians have actually had a longer presence in that land than Jews have.
dear gfromaz
You are right about relatively small numbers of jews in Palestine around 1900. However you are misinformed on other topics. The Romans renamed the province of Judea Palestina after the philistines, following the bar Kochba revolt. There were no "Palestinians" at the time. before the Muslim conquest the locals were Jews, Arameans, Samaritans, Moabitans, Nabateans etc. The Arabs living under Turkish rule did not call themselves Palestinians. There was no separate province of Palestine under the Turks (Assad Senior even claimed the Palestine has to be under Syrian rule). Actually, even in 1937 the leaders of the Arab revolt tended to emphasize the Arab identity. As late as the 1960s the Arab narrative emphasized Pan-Arabism. This did not work well, but was not replaced with cohesive national identities. Look at the Arab world over the past generation - the national identities of Iraq, Lebanon, Syria etc are splintered by ethnic and religious lines to the point of warfare. In Palestine the uniting glue of Palestinian identity is the war against the Jews.
Dear 'The rational', so what's in a name? Fact is Palestinians are Arab - at least most of them and Arabs were one of the early Semitic tribes. The Turks indeed called the land they invaded Palestine and the people Palestinian, a name that can be traced to Roman times. Where the Romans obtained the name is of little importance. Why are American Indians called 'Indians'? When Herzl founded Zionism in 1899 he said "a land without people, people without a land". Why did he say that? No Jews there is the reason why. About 10 or so years ago the Israeli govt used DNA testing to try to establish the lineage of the rabbinical Cohens but failed to connect Israelis to ancient Jews. They did however find a DNA connection between modern Jews and the Khazars and the Kurds. In any event, the Palestinians (Arabs if you will) occupied that land, living under the rule of the Ottoman Turks for 400 years before the Turks were driven out as a result of WW1, only to find the British gave away some of their land under the The Balfour Declaration – which the British had no right to do. Balfour, btw, agreed to allow an all Jewish regiment to occupy parts of Palestine, a regiment headed by a Polish Jew named David Green. After the Turks withdrew, that regiment stayed in Palestine and became the seeds for the beginning of a European Jewish conquest. David Green changed his name to David Ben-Gurion and terrorism was introduced into the Middle East by the Stern Gang and the Irgun. In sum, the Palestinian Arabs are a conquered people who have a visceral connection to the land we now call Palestine and it should be no surprise they don’t accept that without a protest.
The goal of the invading Europeans was / is to return the borders of ancient Israel to Jews and to exclude all non-Jews, including Christians. You can read that in the Jewish Manifesto in Tel Aviv. Or just ask any of the ‘settlers’. The History Museum in Halifax, CA probably presents the most complete and accurate history on this subject that I have seen anywhere.
Dear gfromaz,
Your comment is profoundly misleading. You are incorrect regarding genetic testing - Cohen paternal lineage is well established - not surprising since you get your pals name and your Y chromosome from the same person... You are dead wrong about the Jewish connection to the Khazars - this is a complex story, but today's jews cannot trace themselves to the Khazar nobility who at some point it time practiced Judaism. The story for some reason is popular among the jew-hating crowd; which serves to place you. Jews lived in the land you call Palestine - always, and more would have lived but for the repeated murderous attacks on them. These attacks were by Muslims, but also by Christians. What BS is the "jewish manifesto in Tel Aviv"? And I know enough Jews who live in Judea to tell you that the vast majority of them do not want to exclude Arabs.
The ones who want to exclude Jews are the Palestinian authority - there, selling land to a Jew is punishable by death.
Dear gfromaz,
Your comment is profoundly misleading. You are incorrect regarding genetic testing - Cohen paternal lineage is well established - not surprising since you get your pals name and your Y chromosome from the same person... You are dead wrong about the Jewish connection to the Khazars - this is a complex story, but today's jews cannot trace themselves to the Khazar nobility who at some point it time practiced Judaism. The story for some reason is popular among the jew-hating crowd; which serves to place you. Jews lived in the land you call Palestine - always, and more would have lived but for the repeated murderous attacks on them. These attacks were by Muslims, but also by Christians. What BS is the "jewish manifesto in Tel Aviv"? And I know enough Jews who live in Judea to tell you that the vast majority of them do not want to exclude Arabs.
The ones who want to exclude Jews are the Palestinian authority - there, selling land to a Jew is punishable by death.
Dear gfromaz,
Your comment is profoundly misleading. You are incorrect regarding genetic testing - Cohen paternal lineage is well established - not surprising since you get your pals name and your Y chromosome from the same person... You are dead wrong about the Jewish connection to the Khazars - this is a complex story, but today's jews cannot trace themselves to the Khazar nobility who at some point it time practiced Judaism. The story for some reason is popular among the jew-hating crowd; which serves to place you. Jews lived in the land you call Palestine - always, and more would have lived but for the repeated murderous attacks on them. These attacks were by Muslims, but also by Christians. What BS is the "jewish manifesto in Tel Aviv"? And I know enough Jews who live in Judea to tell you that the vast majority of them do not want to exclude Arabs.
The ones who want to exclude Jews are the Palestinian authority - there, selling land to a Jew is punishable by death.
"The story for some reason is popular among the Jew hating crowd; which serves to place you."
What rubbish this is! Just like any criticism of Israel is labeled anti-Semitic, effective at times, but reprehensible.
The Jewish/Khazar connection is well proven and just the smallest amount of inquiry on your part would show that to be true. However, there is nothing better than seeing real evidence and that can be done by a visit to the Viking museum on the island of Gotland in Sweden. There you will see first hand the artifacts taken by the Swedish Vikings from Khazar that proves a long and deep Jewish relationship. I first learned of the existence of the Khazars at university in a course taught by a wise and wonderful professor who happened to be Jewish. Too bad you didn't have that opportunity.
The Khazars were not a minor people and were the Vikings toughest foe. The Khazars at one point, raised an army of 50,000 men to join with the Magyar army and in earlier times an army of 40,000 men.
Check this link for information on the Khazars; it's from a book first published in 1953, written by Alfred Lilienthal and at the time it was highly praised by such luminaries as Albert Einstein and other prominent Jews:
http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Palestine-Remembered/Story682.html
When the kingdom of the Khazars collapsed because of the pressure from the crusaders from the north and the Muslims from the south, along with the expansion of the Slavic tribes from the east, the Jewish/Khazar population scattered into what became eastern European and planted the seeds for the Jewish presence in later Poland, Russia, etc. You know, where all the Israeli leaders originated. Where did Netanyahu's family originate for example?
Norman Davies, the British historian and expert on Polish history has stated that 90% of all Jews in the world can trace their lineage back to then Poland, which at one point was the largest country in Europe. And those Jews can trace their lineage to Khazar.
Can you cite any significant history of the Jewish people in Palestine between the end of the Roman era and the 20th century. Where is it written that Jews were present in any significant numbers during the Ottoman invasion - just as an example. Why did Herzl say "a land without people, people without a land" when he founded Zionism in 1899? Was it because of the absence of Jews? And why, when the Jews were expelled from Spain by the Christian Spanish, they never migrated to Palestine instead to countries like Turkey with a largely Muslim population. Could it be they didn't view Palestine as a homeland.
To answer your statement about the PA prohibiting the sale of land to Jews that can be summed up in one word, survival. What do you suppose would happen if a settler sold his land (stolen at that) to a Palestinian? How long after do you think he would live?
There is indeed a Jewish manifesto that clearly states the goals of the invading European Jews in expelling the Arabs, and in the words of Ben-Gurion, "so they shall not return". It also refers to the return of the lands of biblical Israel (whatever that was) to exclusively Jews.
I'm not a "Jew-hater", in fact quite the opposite, the contribution by Jews in so many areas in modern times is quite remarkable, and the holocaust deniers should be sentenced to spent time at the infamous death camps so they can be set straight. However, all this does not excuse the Jewish subjugation of other people because of a spiritual connection.
Your reaction is a typical Zionist response when faced with the unpleasant truth; denial and blustering accusations.
Israel is now a fact of life and we can't continue to try to turn back the hands of time by saying it should be eliminated. But if Israeli policy doesn't change, if the settler movement isn't halted, then Israel will cease to exist over the next 50 years - and that would be regrettable. The rise in anti-Semitism around the world, even here is some parts of Asia, should be of great concern and it's really all in the hands of Israel leaders.
In conclusion, if you still wish to deny or challenge anything I have said please do so with documentation and equanimity.
Shalom
Thanks for TE to write about this subject without fearing attacks on both sides.
In the same year that Jewish children are shot for no crime, but being Jewish and antisemetic incidents are on the rise (violence and desecration of graveyards and synagogues).
Israel, the home of the Jews, is being threatened by Iran, who is developing nuclear weapons and a peace process that is dying because the other side is not even able to reconcile within.
Israeli tourists are targetted abroad (non combatant women, children) and the countries around are falling like dominos and so far giving way to a religious Muslim rule.
Really? The Jews never had it better? Things are looking up???
In 20 years from now I expect the above Jewish people's geographical distribution graph to reflect the following:
- The total number of Jews would be, at best, at their current levels. This is due to heavy assimilation process among US Jews.
- The distribution of world Jewry will be such, that vast majority of Jews will reside in Israel, also due to US Jewry speedy disappearance as a result of vast assimilation.
If more people like the Indians or the Chinese abandon their old faiths and embrace Judaism like the Khazars, there will not be enough Holy land for the promised returns for all the Jews.
In natural manner, a free faith or religions is quite okay. We only refuse israelism. Draw the line of human exploitation in Gaza for example represented by israelism.
So Jewish World Conspiration is illusion. Israeli World Conspiration is absolutely yes, developed by design indeed. Among other to conquer US by temporary smart lobbies of AIPAC organization.
About the Ashkenazi Jews=Khazars:
Until couple of decades ago, such a claim linking all Jewish Ashkenazi to the Khazars could have been made, just as easily as any other claim about the origin of Jews could have. There was room for variuous hypothesis which were left for estimations & assesments of scholars and hitorians, beliefs etc., but none could have been proved.
This was the case until genetic science became available, and could provide its detemined conclusions.
The clear, undisputed conclusion refutes the claims that the Jewish Ashkenazi people originate fro the converted Khazars, or any other convert community. The most that researches can confirm is that Khazar may count for 12% max. of Ashkenzi Jews.
A 1999 study by Hammer et al., published in the Proceedings of the United States National Academy of Sciences compared the Y chromosomes of Ashkenazi, Roman, North African, Kurdish, Near Eastern, Yemenite, and Ethiopian Jews with 16 non-Jewish groups from similar geographic locations. It found that "Despite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level... The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora."
According to Nicholas Wade "The results accord with Jewish history and tradition and refute theories like those holding that Jewish communities consist mostly of converts from other faiths, or that they are descended from the Khazars, a medieval Turkish tribe that adopted Judaism."
Concerning male-line ancestry, several Y-DNA studies have tested the hypothesis of Khazar ancestry amongst Ashkenazim. In these studies Haplogroup R1a chromosomes (sometimes called Eu 19) have been identified as potential evidence of one line of Eastern European ancestry amongst Ashkenazim, which could possibly be Khazar. One concluded that "neither the NRY haplogroup composition of the majority of Ashkenazi Jews nor the microsatellite haplotype composition of the R1a1 haplogroup within Ashkenazi Levites is consistent with a major Khazar or other European origin"
And there are many other researches confirming the linkage between ALL jewish communities going back 2500 years.
So once and for all, happyfish18, you can lay to rest the Ashkenazi Jews=Khazar story. It is a nice bed-time story, nothing more.
You say:
'We only refuse israelism.'
Who cares?
South and East Asians welcome. Love their commitment to learning.
IllegalOccupier,
You know very litte and presume much. Israel is too small and weak to have any conspiracies on the world stage; it is just trying to survive and thrive. It is full of regular people who want to live, raise kids and have a career. This includes Jews and Arabs, and others. You also have a strange imaginary view of AIPAC. That organization does a very simple thing - it educates US elected officials about Israel, and supports a strong relationship between US and Israel as being in the US national interest. They have no actual power, and anyone can say whatever they want and talk to their representatives. And, guess what - everyone does. Countless lobbyists swarm Capitol Hill; for better of worse, it is the nature of American Democracy. No conspiracy is needed.
81 percent of the jews do not live in Israel. Indeed, the figure is less than 50%. The 81% figure appears to be a mistake.
Read it carefully: The title talks about 81% living in Israel and the United States..
Some people start reading, and when they find something they think is strange or don't like, they stop reading without finishing the sentence and rush into comment. Happens often.
@IllegalOccupier, Indeed The Judaism can live together with Budhas, Confucianism, Christians, Moslems but when its outside Israel, as we can see then in other places. Its a pity they dont that with Palestines Arab, Moslems and Christians.
Unfortunately it is the other way around. It is the Palestinian who does not want to live alongside the Jew in Israel
When will the Muslim occupiers of North Africa,Central Asia, the MidEast, etc abandon their seized territories????
There are no seized Muslim territories. Most Muslims -- including most Arabic-speakers -- don't descend from Arabic conquerors of the VII century. They descend from natives who adopted the rulers' language and religion. Trust me, there weren't nearly enough Arabs in the VII century -- or today, for that matter -- to populate an area spanning from Morocco to Mesopotamia, replacing the natives living there. And I'm not even going to talk about Central and Southeast Asia, regions where the ethnicc distinctiveness vis-à-vis Arabic peoples couldn't be more obvious.
BLESSED THEM THAT BLESS THEE CURSE THEM THAT CURSETH THEE.BEHOLD I DID NOT COME TO BRING PEACE BUT A SWORD.I WILL DESTROY ALL MY ENEMIES.REPENT REPENT IS THE THAT IS WRITTEN FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE END OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES.HAGGI HOSEA DANIEL JOB AMOS ETC.I AM HE DECLARED AND WAS CRUCIFIED FOR ALL OUR SINS.I AM A MESSIANIC JEW.MY NAME IS MORDECHI MY HOUSE IS DAVID AND MY TRIBE IS THE LION OF JUDAH.JESUS IS MY LORD AND SAVIOUR ALL MY HOPE AND IHAVE BEEN BORN AGAIN.BLESSED IS OUR LORD .I AM NOW THE SON OF MOST HIGH GOD.HE LOVES U ALL AND DOES NOT ONE YOU TO PERISH NO NOT ONE.THATS HOW MUCH HE LOVES U. REPENT MY FRIENDS.FOR A GREAT DECEIVING SPIRIT IS HERE DECEIVING MANY.IT IF POSSIBLE WOULD DECEIVE THE ELECT.READ FIRST BOOK OF KINGS LAST TWO CHAPTERS.BEHOLD I COME LIKE A THIEF IN THE NIGHT.LOOK UP FOR YOUR REDMPTION IS NEAR.GOD BLESSES THOSE WHO LOVE HIM AND HIS SON.SHALLOM DEAR BROTHERSAND SISTERS IN CHRIST OUR LORD AND SAVIOR
Based from the Bible revelations of Teacher Eraño Evangelista in :
http://www.thename.ph/thename/revelations/greatestdeception-en.htm
There is a Word of God about Jesus-the descendant/offspring of King David that we should know:
2 Samuel 7:12-14
New International Version (NIV)
12 When your days are over and you rest with your ancestors, I will raise up your offspring to succeed you, your own flesh and blood, and I will establish his kingdom. 13 He is the one who will build a house for my Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. 14 I will be his father, and he will be my son. WHEN HE DOES WRONG, I WILL PUNISH HIM WITH A ROD WIELDED BY MEN, WITH FLOGGINGS INFLICTED BY HUMAN HANDS
In the said verses: 2 Samuel 7:12-14 – we can read that God speaks of a coming offspring of David and not a literal "son of God" as what the religions preach.
Is it really true that Jesus was a descendant of David?
…to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a descendant of David.
The virgin's name was Mary.
Luke 1:27 (NIV)
Jesus' true father is Joseph who belongs to the house of David. So if we are to believe the teaching of the religions that Jesus is the “son of God,” then it should be Mary who should belong to the house of David.
And:
You will be with child and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus.
Luke 1:31 (NIV)
And who was Jesus' father?
He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David.
Luke 1:32 (NIV)
"will be called" – As you have read it, Jesus was only a son or a descendant of David not a real son of God;" he was just a man.
Is it true –that Jesus is a son of David? In Matthew 1:1
A record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham-Matt 1:1
Now we can see that the prophecy in 2 Sam7:12-14 about a coming descendant of David and not a son of God has been fulfilled.
Considering the prophecy in II Samuel 7:12-14 that if the descendant of David commits a wrong or an iniquity, he will be punished with the rod of men. Maestro Evangelista says Jesus was also punished by men. What is the proof?
All the people answered, "Let his blood be on us and on our children!" Then he released Barabbas to them. But he had Jesus flogged, and handed him over to be crucified.
Matthew 27:25-26 (NIV)
Indeed, Jesus was flogged by men which when we read again what God stated in the prophecy in 2 Sam 7:14:
14 I will be his father, and he will be my son. WHEN HE DOES WRONG, I WILL PUNISH HIM WITH A ROD WIELDED BY MEN, WITH FLOGGINGS INFLICTED BY HUMAN HANDS
We can discover for ourselves that based on what God said in the prophecy that the real reason why He allowed Jesus -the descendant of king David to be beaten by men was not for our sins but for his (Jesus) own wrongdoing.
It appears now that the Apostles-the writers of the New Testament who claimed that Jesus was sent by God to be beaten for our sins were hiding from us what really happened to Jesus.
The pastors would say it was King Solomon who was prophesied in 2 Samuel 7:12-14 but he wasn't flogged by men when he committed sin against God.
It was Jesus -the offspring of David - who was flogged and beaten by the rod of men.
http://www.thename.ph/thename/revelations/greatestdeception-en.htm
Lets be clear, Jews did not 'migrate' in 1948 from the Levant countries, they were expelled. The number of Jewish refugees in 1948 was roughly equivalent to the number of Palestinian refugees. However Jewish refugees were absorbed by Israel and other countries and not left to fester like Palestinian refugees.
There are almost as many Palestinians in Arab refugee camps as are in the West Bank and Gaza. Arabs, despite all the rhetoric appear not want to grant their Palestinian brothers citizenship. This would fix a major portion of the problem.
In 21st century its a competition of ideas, philosophies, principles,religions, type of economy to be followed by individual, collective, national as well as international policies. Its no longer possible to impose anything. Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, Hindu preachers are propagating about respective religions. I am not sure about Jewish way. Of all the known religions, Judaism is one of the oldest religions but are presently 13.58 million followers as per and TE.Yes, someone may bring in the effect of holocaust and earlier Roman persecution. I wonder are they falling behind in competition?
Which competition was that?
It is prohibited in Judaism to invite non-Jews to join. Converts are accepted with caution and are encouraged to reconsider. Only the most insisting ones are accepted after lengthy process. This might answer your question, why the numbers do not grow.
This is a re-post; sorry for the confusion. The system somehow managed to badly garble my first post, and the edit function didn't seem to work.
.
There is something very strange about this article.
The article claims 16.5 million Jews in 1939, which is likely accurate, since the World Almanac claims 15.6 in 1934. But the World Almanac lists the worldwide Jewish population in 1946 at 15.7 million. In other words, a slight increase from 1934 to 1946.
At the time, the Almanac listed the US Jewish population at around 5 million, the same number the Economist article claims for today.
And let's not bother slandering the World Almanac; it had always had a good reputation for accuracy and freedom from bias or ideology. World Jewish websites have a tendency to trash anything they don't agree with, but any disagreement I have seen on these population statistics has always just been wild undocumented claims, presented with no evidence whatever, and blamed - like everything else - on anti-Semitism.
The Economist tells us the worldwide Jewish population declined from about 16 million in 1946 to about 13 million today, but there are no independent or unbiased census polls that document or justify the Economist's population statements. These are just bald claims, with no basis or evidence.
Also, for decades, the US Jewish associations 'forbade' the US government and census bureau to distinguish Jews from their national passports, which means they could be identified only as Russian or Ukranian or German, but not as Jews.
The US census was forbidden by the US Jewish associations from asking or collecting any information about Jews as Jews. In fact, during the migration in the 1940s, violent arguments erupted between these associations and the US government, and the government lost.
They were finally 'permitted' to record only nation of origin, their Jewish heritage kept secret from all but the associations.
It was only the New York kehilla that was permitted to record and know the actual number of Jews in the US, and it was beholden to nobody.
I don't know the purpose of deliberately, and badly, understating the world's Jewish populaition, but we must assume there is indeed a reason.
One can assume only that these population figures are presented to lend credibility to the standard claim of 6 million Jews dying in the Second War.
In any case, the claim of only 13 million for worldwide Jewry today is patently false. Trust the Economist to pull such a stunt.
I am in no mood to deal with your paranoia, psychosis and conspiracy theories, so this will be brief.
Most countries DO record such data in their censuses. In fact, in Russia your Jewishness is stamped on your passport and internal documents.
The US government does not. But organized Jewry has been working with social scientists to approximate the number of Jews in the US for decades. Your lunatic stories about the US in the 1940s are figments of your imagination.
There is a large issue as to how we define a Jew. That skews the numbers in a population this small. If you will lift your head up from your "Jewish World Conspiracy" pamphlets you will note that Israel has been in turmoil on this subject for nearly 20 years ... ever since some 2,000,000 people immigrated to Israel from Russia who called themselves Jews, moany of whom are not. Rabbis have one opinion, the secular government of Israel has another, and the various Jewish denominations in the US have four more.
It gets harder. If a non-Jew calls herself a Jew, how do you score it? If a Jew declares that she is no longer a Jew, how do you score it? Do you go by the definition of the Orthodox rabbinate or the Reform rabbinate? Or secular social scientists?
13.58 million is the best current estimate. Others good estimates vary from 12 million to 16 million.
Don't lose any more hair over it. Untwist your knickers.
Yes, yes. Anyone presenting historial facts that don't fit your fable, automatically qualify as "paranoid, psychotic conspiracy theorists".
When you have no provable facts at your disposal, try to attack and discredit the victim - normally by starting with "Anti-Semitic, Jew-hating Nazi holocaust-denier. You missed those.
""The US was at the time (1940s) panicking over the Russian and other European Revolutions and was not blind to the fact that so many Jewish Communists were migrating to the US - many under pressure from the Jewish lobby which was already powerful enough to demand that only the nationality of these immigrants be recorded and not the fact that they were either Jews or Communists.
To our best knowledge, to this day, only the US Jewish associations, the New York kehilla for one, knows the number or identity of the Jews in the US, since this information is controlled by the "Jewish Government" resident in the USA.
In fact, the US government, through the power of the Jewish lobby, has surrendered the right of racial identification - for this one race alone. The Jews claim to be a race, a nation of people, just as Russians or Italians do, but the US government is denied the right to identify them as such, only the country of birth being recorded."
Your response is the standard Jewish one for denying facts you don't like - introduce countless irrelevancies in an attempt to so badly confuse any debate that focusing on the main issues becomes impossible.
Also, your name-calling and other tactics are taken directly from the Hasbara Handbook - "Seven Basic Propaganda Devices". You can read the entire document here:
http://www.bearcanada.com/china/wujshasbara.pdf
Name Calling
"Through the careful choice of words, the name-calling technique links a person or an idea to a negative symbol. " . . . to try and get an audience to reject a person or idea . . . without allowing a real examination of that person or idea."
It is important to be aware of the subtly different meanings that well-chosen words give. Call "demonstrations", "riots".
(Ed: labelling people as "anti-Semitic", "Nazi Jew-hater" or "conspiracy theorists" can be quite effective.)
Fear
"Warn of consequences of ignoring the Jewish message. Listeners have deep-seated fears of disorder, which can be tapped into by creating false dichotomies. Listeners are too preoccupied by the threat to think critically about the (opponent's) message."
"Fear is easily manipulated . . .Fear is difficult to counter . . ."
Should I continue?
Do whatever you want. I won't waste any time trying to refute your sad little "Jewish lobby", "Jewish World Conspiracy", and "ZOG" fantasies.
Everything I wrote is provable ... and I invite anyone to look up anything and everything I wrote and see for themselves.
And if anyone wants to learn about the mighty power of the (non-existent) "Jewish lobby" in 1940s America, they can look up the history of the "SS St. Louis".
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_St._Louis
http://www.blechner.com/ssstlouis/
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/stlouis.html
and many others.
watchingchina, you should just go and watch china, you have no clue about the world, different faiths and religions.
WatchingChina,
At the bottom of the map it states that the numbers shown represent only Jews registered in their respective community.
This is a self selecting group and fails to count the Jews who do not register with their respective communities. This may be for may reasons. The case is especially true in the former Communist countries.
Thus this map does not claim to show the total population of all Jews in the world, but merely those registered with their communities.
I dont care a big number population of Jews and Judaism. No problemo. Because the Jews are human beings, children of Moses, like children of Jesus, like children of Mohamed. However, the growing of Israelism and their war habits has brought humanity on the brink. Better we creating development habits, productivity habits, efficiency habits, industrial habits, manufacture habits, economy habits. We need food, employment. Not deaths.
Please continue your sentences till drop. Enlighten the dark opinion. Why they hate criticism toward modern exploitation?
Normally, if u face drunken people, they can't feel Israelism covered the US.
Go on wachingchina. The Jewish society needs enlightenment. They ellapsed a half of century as a consequences of Israeli wars worldwide to cheating goyims in UN.
Yah, that 1946 World Almanac figures.. This one is commonly used by Holocaust deniers.
Post WWII, it took time to gather figures regarding the different peoples and how many are there who belong to them. The Almanac did several errors in that respect, the Jewish people's figure being one of those errors.
In 1949, however, the World Almanac gave a revised 1939 population of 16,643,120 giving a difference of between 1938 and 1947 of 5,376,520.
So there you go… Look for another 'error' to parrot.
Yes, yes. It's only the dreaded "Holocaust Deniers" who use World Almanac figures.
And it's only the Jewish-owned and controlled Wikipedia and similar Jewish websites that make the claim about the revision of figures by the World Almanac. I know of no unbiased reference that makes such a claim.
And, like all these claims, they are totally undocumented and unverified. Just bald claims meant to put doubt in the minds of the uninformed.
And by the way, if you care to provide real documented evidence to prove that those figures were indeed revised, would you mind please also including a statement made under oath that the editors weren't coerced by worldwide Jewry into publishing their 'revised' figures?
I've seen too many situations where political and economic pressure was put on a publisher who offended one or another Jewish organisation, and ended up either sucking eggs or being forced into involuntary bankruptcy by the sudden disappearance of all advertising and funding. Would you like some examples?
So, you can look for another historical revisionism to parrot. You have no shortage. The Chinese opium holocaust didn't exist, and even if it did, the Jews weren't involved, and even if they were, they were really British citizens, and besides, it was all the victim's fault anyway.
The Jewish Bolshevik-induced Ukrainian famine never happened; it was just an anti-Semitic accusation, and even if it wasn't . . .
You get the idea.
'Luckily', the Germans are very organized people. Germans taking part in the holocaust execution wanted to be able to prove to their superiors that they followed the orders they received, and so they have documented thoroughly their victims and all their murderous actions.
The German Bad Arolsen archive contains 26,000(!) meters of records, including 50 million cards about 17.5 million people, many of them holocaust victims. It runs the International Tracing Service, helping locate information about holocaust victims.
http://www.its-arolsen.org/en/archives/index.html
And what you place your argument with? - Almanac, which issues an annual publication that includes information about pretty much everything, from weather forecasts, tide tables, population figures, and many others categories.
For you, a single figure appearing in this publication concerning Jewish people numbers in 1946 is everything you need to know. Tons of evidence, and miles of documents that prove otherwise are meaningless. For you, that single Almanac figure suffices to prove there was no holocaust, and it is my duty to provide a statement under oath by someone at Almanac making confirming that 1946 incorrect figure.
This is ridiculous. Of course I won't bother, and not only in the face of all that endless holocaust evidence. Even if I do bring you evidence of the Almanac error, you are still likely to seek other excuse to prove there was no holocaust, which you would then demand again I prove that one is wrong..
Of course I didn't provide the link to Yad Vashem in Israel, as this is an Israeli institute, so I guess for you it is, by definition, an organization which is part of the conspiracy, right?
As revealed in the recent release of White House recordings from the Nixon era, Henry Kissinger, the former US Secretary of State told President Richard Nixon in a 1973 conversation that it wouldn’t be an American concern if the U.S.S.R. sent its Jews to the gas chambers.
Nixon had met with then Prime Minister Golda Meir, a meeting at which the issue of the oppression of Soviet Jewry had apparently been raised.
Kissinger said in a subsequent recorded conversation with Nixon, "The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy. And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern."
The transcript of the recording created consternation among Jewish groups because Mr Kissinger is a German-born Jew and is regarded as a staunchly pro-Israel figure. Mr. Kissinger's defense: "It is hurtful to see an out-of-context remark being taken so contrary to its intentions .."
And of course, the Jewish Anti-Defamation League issued a statement saying this was a reminder that "even great individuals are flawed". How touching. If you or I said anything similar about Jews, I doubt the judgment descending upon us would be quite so generous.
Strait Forward wrote:
"Even if I do bring you evidence of the Almanac error, you are still likely to seek other excuse to prove there was no holocaust . . ."
You misunderstand the problem. It isn't a matter of denial, but of concern. I don't care if your "holocaust" occurred or didn't occur. Why should I care? It may be important to you, but it isn't important to me.
Do you think that's cruel and heartless? Well, tell me, how many Jews care about anyone else's suffering? Do the Jews today care about the 20 million to 30 million that the Jewish Bolsheviks murdered in Russia, in their gulags?
Do any Jewish people today care about the 6 million Ukrainians who died in the Jewish-orchestrated famine? Do any Jews care about the 5 million people killed in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia?
Do any Jews care about the 130 million Chinese who were enslaved by the Jewish Sassoon family's great opium enterprise?
Of course not. At least, there is no evidence of any concern. Instead, Jewish authors like Julia Lovell make a point of trivialising these atrocities, calling them "a tragic-comedy".
Well, if the enormous deaths and sufferings of other peoples are just a tragi-comedy, then perhaps we can refer to your Jewish "holocaust" as a tragic-comedy too.
And since Lovell, and every other Jewish author I've ever seen, denigrate, deny, dismiss, trivialise all other suffering by all other peoples and, in the end, just blame the victims for their own misfortune, then perhaps we can just trivialise your suffering and blame the Jews for their own misfortune.
And since these same Jewish authors make a point of telling us that in any case these other atrocities and holocausts happened a long time ago, and it's time to forget and to move on, then we should be able to tell the Jews the same thing. It was all a long time ago; time to forget and move on.
That's fair, isn't it? You apparently don't give a sh*t for anyone else, so why should anyone else care about you?
Why do so many Jewish authors and columnists, and people like you, persist in recalling every detail of something that happened close to a century ago?
Why do you persist in trying to recall every name of every Jew who ever suffered? Do the Russians do that? Do the Chinese try to identify the names of all those who suffered so terribly from the Jewish opium franchise?
Are the Russians and the Chinese pursuing the Sassoons, the Rothschilds, and all the other Jewish families for compensation for the atrocities committed in the past by the Jews? Perhaps they should be doing so.
And what about the Palestinians? What about the perhaps one million deaths, most of whom would have been women and children? Do any Jews care about them? I've seen little evidence of it. Mostly, you just deny that anything happened, and if anything did happen, it was the victim's own fault.
Well, I think the time has come for the world to treat the Jews in the same way they treat the world.
Why is it ok for Jews to hate Chinese, or Arabs, or Palestinians, but not ok for anyone to even think the slightest negative thought about the Jews?
Because you're God's chosen people? I doubt that.
Why is it ok for the Jews and the Jewish media to saturate and overwhelm the world with their "holocaust" to the point where all events from 1939 to 1945 were all about the Jews, and the entire Second World War was just a kind of trivial sideshow?
Why should the whole world be led into this foolish myth of Jews being underdogs and persecuted, when today Jews control most of the media and entertainment, banking and finance, and most of the US government?
Why should the world any longer accept the urban legend fed by these same Jewish media that the Jews are just poor helpless people who need to be protected by anti-speech laws, while those same Jews can do anything to anybody, with impunity?
Why should the world feel guilty for something that happened before most everyone was born, and in which they had no part?
So, it isn't a matter of whether Jews died in the Second World War. It's a matter of the other 50 million people who died too. And since Jews apparently don't give a damn about them, why should anybody care about the Jews?
I think much of the world is sick and tired of the Jews setting this apparently permanent agenda of myth and guilt, while deliberately rewriting history to ensure the suffering of all other peoples is trivialised, and that the Jews' involvement in many of those atrocities is deleted or buried.
Kissinger comments on the US position regarding possible Soviet gas chambers are horrendous and inexcusable. Those are vile words, which are completely disgraceful.
No context is relevant to such a statement. Anything except outright condemnation, without ifs and buts, can be taken for this one.
Nixon's response to Kissinger was by the way: "I know, we can’t blow up the world because of it."
This should tell you something about the 'AIPAC almighty', and its supposed influence on the US administration, isn't it?
During WWII, US Air force bombers flew over Auschwitz, dropping bombs on targets couple of miles away from the gas chambers, but NEVER allocated a SINGLE mission to bomb either the death camps or the railroads leading to Auschwitz.
30 years after the German gas chamber were in full operation, the US President states again that such genocide on Jews is none of the USA business.
In other words, the power people assign to AIPAC is overly exaggerated, and is far less than what people assign to it. As you can see, when push comes to shove, the Jewish people are on their own. That's why they need a strong and an independent state of Israel with a strong army to defend them. No one, not including the US, will take any risks to save the neck of the Jew.
Israel can't flatly count on the US protection, even if a Jew serves as the National Security Advisor, and later on the Secretary of State.
You tell me:
'You misunderstand the problem. It isn't a matter of denial, but of concern… Well, tell me, how many Jews care about anyone else's suffering?'
Let's see, Turkey:
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/08/28/world/quake-relief-shows-israel-feels-...
Let's see, Haiti:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uypAs5nBbDc
Aiding Israeli Arab families:
http://www.jpost.com/NationalNews/Article.aspx?id=277881
Let's see, Japan:
http://www.algemeiner.com/2011/03/17/where-are-the-arab-offers-of-aid-to...
Helping Arab children:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaP3IMJhqns
Beyond the examples I gave you of sufferings Jews care for, I can only mention that the rest of your notes about millions of Russians killed supposedly due to Jews; Ukrainian famine blamed on Jews; Chinese opium trade blamed on Jews... just help all readers see your anti-Semitic convictions that drive your agenda.
Thank you for helping clarifying that.
You say:
'Why do you persist in trying to recall every name of every Jew who ever suffered?'
Apart from wanting to remember perished family members, Jews wish to put all on record because people like you bring up mistakes like the one made by Almanac as a proof there was no holocaust.
The only way to prove there was is to present you with the millions of names, the places they came from, their pictures, their death camp files, to PROVE you that those people did once live, and that their lives were taken for their simple 'crime' of being Jews.
You said that "I don't care if your "holocaust" occurred or didn't occur. Why should I care? It may be important to you, but it isn't important to me."
It is for you to decide, wc. I think every human being should care. Everyone should care, NOT because millions of Jews were murdered just for being of Jewish origin. I think all should care because millions of HUMANS were murdered just for belonging to a certain origin.
If you care for millions of Ukrainians (also Jews starved to death in the Ukraine, by the way), but do not care about the Jewish holocaust because Jews were slaughtered, then you are a plain racist. And if you do not care for murdered people because generally you do not care, then you end up with further genocides like the one in Cambodia; or like the one in Rwanda; or the one in Srebrenica; or the one in Darfur.
Your post wrecks of anti-Semitism. But, of course, you don't notice the stench of yourself.
No matter what, Jews are less than 1/4% of 1% of the total population of the planet.
What the Christian Crusades didn't manage to finish, Hitler tried for more.
Seems Christians only recognize the murder of one Jew - Jesus. But only recently have Christians made some progress in admitting to themselves that they are praying to an orthodox Jew.
The word you want is "reeks", not "wrecks". People who can't spell and who misuse words are normally those who don't (or can't) read. Maybe pick up a good book once in a while. May I recommend 'False Inheritance'?
And yes I know the Crusaders and Christians and everybody have been so mean to you for a long time. But that's pretty much over now, isn't it?
Time to stop whining about being a victim? Or maybe you think the victims of some Jewish atrocities should follow your example?
We love every couple of Judaism and other religions or race. Be the citizen of the world. However we can't love a couple of armed system and illegal occupation which disrupt one world.
A homework for Jews to correct Israeli ambition.
Good article-highly appreciated.
The Judaism can live together with Budhas, Confucianism, Christians, Moslems. Can Israel be respectful to the rights of Palestines, Arab, Moslems? Normal migration is always welcome everywhere. Abnormal migration not for living but for conquering the world by Protocol, is a curse. Gloom Conduct. Irresponsible Plan of migration. And there is a force, powerfulholic, innocent victims.
Be living peacefullly.
The smart rational people of the world can easily differ the Jews and Israel. For humanity reason, the occupation of Palestine soil is a sustainable super-big problem in the world. Illegal setttlement truly is a time bomb. Also a modern Pharaoh style to crash civilisation of Moses. Can you escape from this problem? No we can't.
I am confused. Is Judaism a race or a religion ? Is it definable by DNA.
Are there any other peoples that are definable by as a race by religion?
If you are an Italian Jew are you Italian or a Jew?
Most people identify Jews by religion, not nationality.
The reality is that Jews are a race. Whatever they tell you, they are not Caucasian White, they are actually the same race as Arabs. However, the members of their race also happen to be the same religion of Judaism.
Technically, a black person could convert to Judaism, but typically, a Jew is a race and a religion. However, many Jews don't really believe in anything, but their mafia like cliques are bound by race.
Sounds like you got dropped on your head at a young age and never recovered.
I answered your question, but you choose not to believe me. Here are my facts.
1. Most American Jews I know are not practicing the Judaic religion. If you ask them "what are you?" they will say Jewish.
2. In history, there have been many Jewish atheists. However, they still considered themselves Jewish.
3. A Semite is either an Arab or a Jew. Racially, they are the same. The only difference is that Jews intermarried, and still intermarry in large numbers with white people. Therefore, it is more difficult to tell them apart from actual white people.
There is nothing patently devious or wrong with 1, 2, or 3.
I've never understood why people like
e5dLoC4EaC feel the need to post nonsense when someone asks a simple question. And "the Jews are a race" is big-time nonsense -- both in terms of Jews and of Judaism ... and of race.
We won't get into the definition of "race", but trust me - you couldn't define one if you tried. No one can.
Why you are confused is that you are thinking in bogus categories, and you are confusing race (whatever THAT is), nationality and religion.
The Jews are a People. Yes. a People. That's why they call themselves "The Jewish People".
Where it gets complicated is that the Jews are also a Nation. I'll let you look that up.
The concept "nation" only emerged recently in world history. The Italians and the Germans only became nations around 1850. As did the Jews. The Balkans are still trying to sort that out, as is Africa.
Like any other nation, the Jews have laws concerning emigration and immigration. If someone wants to become a Jew (whether black, white, yellow, green or blue) there are long-standing rules that the Jewish Nation enforces. Jews call it "conversion".
The Jews are also a Culture. Or you could say that he Jewish Nation HAS a culture.
Just as the English and the French have a recognizable language, literature, music, art, film, predominant religion, dance steps and hair styles, the Jewish People's Culture does as well.
Now where THAT gets confusing is that most Peoples and most Nations have a homeland. The Jews have a homeland, but have lived outside of it for 1900 years. BTW - the Kurds have a homeland and a culture but they have been denied Nationhood.
I'll let you work out how to classify Native Americans and Australian Aborigines in terms of Nationality, Peoplehood, Culture, Religion and Tribe.
Which brings us to the next category. The Jews are a Tribe. The tribe of Judah, if you are familiar with Hebrew Scriptures. Hence the name.
Speaking of Tribes, so are the Kurds, so are Native Americans, Australian Aborigines and most Africans. Sadly, most African Tribes are not contiguous with their homelands OR with their Nations.
Lastly - the religion of the Jewish People is called Judaism.
As anyone on Earth can become a Jew if they so desire, there is obviously no DNA test.
If you are an Italian Jew you are an Italian and you are a Jew. Generally, Europe has different notions of Nationality and Religion than does the rest of the world. In fact they fought a gazillion wars for more than 400 years to settle those issues.
In the US being Jewish is not a nationality at all. We don't play by those rules. Instead, "Jewish" is an ethnic heritage and "Judaism" is a religion.
If you have been following closely you see how it is possible to be an atheist Jew, but this is getting too complicated, so I will leave it there.
e5dLoC4EaC, you couldn't define a "race" if you tried. I'd like to see you convert to another race (whatever THAT is).
Anyone on Earth can become a Jew if they wish to. Any size, any color, any gender, any age, any hair color, any eye color.
******
"Semitic" is a language group. "Semites" are members of a group of Semitic-speaking peoples of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians.
So a Jew living in New Jersey who speaks English and a little Italian is not a Semite. Ditto a Muslim in Jersey City and a Babylonian in Princeton.
*****
Oh yeah - the "Judaic religion" is called Judaism by the rest of the world.
Why don't you guys do some reading about this. There are two great books.
1. "Abraham's Children" by Jon Entine talks about Jewish DNA and answers a lot of these trivial questions. Arabs and Jews have not been the same thing for a long time.
2. "A History of the Jews" by Paul Johnson talks about the creation of the Jewish identity. It happened a long time ago-- Israeli/ Jew became two different things after the Assyrian conquest-- thousands of years ago.
Please don't repeat the post modernist foolishness. There is a such thing as race. And it corresponds to various things. IQ. High blood pressure. Incidence of diabetes. Etc.
A very Interesting Article. The chart shows that there are virtually no Jewish presence in Asia after the 1950s. There was a time when large numbers of Jewish people settled in Shanghai.