The evolution of Olympic events for men and women
WOMEN first competed in the Olympics in 1900, when they played golf and tennis in single-sex competitions, and participated alongside men in sailing events and croquet. Nowadays, the only discipline in which men and women can compete directly against each other is on horseback. Indeed, women have competed in dressage since 1952 (notable also as the first year the event was open to riders other than officers). All six equestrian events this year are open to both sexes. As can be seen in our graphic, there is still a long way to go before women have as many chances to win a gold medal as men. There are 131 events for women compared with 163 for men. Some disparities are easier to fathom than others: male boxers have ten events, women (who box for the first time at this games) have three. Movements are being made towards parity, though: in 2008 men had 11 cycling events and women seven; this year they are split evenly.
Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
As far as Japan is concerned, the Women's Soccer, Volleyball, and Wrestling squads set off for London with higher expectations than their respective male counterparts, so there was a lot of flak aimed at Men's Soccer team for travelling on Business class while the Women's team travelled Premium Economy. That flak has all but died when the Men's team defeated Spain in their opening game though... lol
I guess no one is going to touch the.. "in-between" issue. I remember a certain South African runner whose chromosomes weren't exactly similar to her competitor's.
Also the Chinese have been doping their female athletes (at least the ones are actually women and not children lying about their age) to the point that they can hardly be called female anymore either.
感觉 还行
This article got me all excited as I thought it was going to catalogue of all the intercourse rumours that I'm hearing in the news. Sometimes I wish I was actually above average at sport just so I could appreciate the sex that goes on in the Olympic village.
I wonder if the same thing happens in the Paralympics....
I think women will as equal as men in Olympics with the time go on.
A perspective excellent at analyzing the Games:
Daily chart Olympics--Sexing the games by The Economist online
The evolution of Olympic events for men and women
The numbers are impressive, since women were once forbidden to participate and today almost equate to the men concerning inserction, composing 45% of the athletes in London, if I'm not wrong.
I haven't been able to get excited about the Olympics ever since tug-o-war was dropped as an event.
Given tug-of-war was discontinued around 90 years ago, it is going to be tough to get exited about anything now for you :p
True! Bring back the tug-o-war, I say!
For real equality, there should be no "Men's" or "Women's" events - just events that are open to either sex.
You know it's impossible
No offense but women won't get gold medals when events are open to either sex
So basically just men's events then. Perhaps a few female shooters and gymnasts. I was a swimmer. My all time best world ranking position was 41, yet I was faster than 5 of the women's world records !
That's the drawback to 'equality of opportunity' in any arena - it doesn't necessarily produce equal results. Unlike equality in 'number of opportunities given to each sex', which is approximately equal in the Olympics. The piece is only about changes to the latter.
The Olympic Games could easily be changed to include many more events where women would reasonably be expected do at least as well as men on an even-footing; but then it wouldn't have much to do with its original intention.
Then short people should have their own basketball competition, long people their own gymnastics, etc. Women don't need to be treated like kids... right?
If women in Burga are not permitted by IOC to compete whereas near-nakedness is encouraged like in the ancient pagan times, there is no telling whether these results can be considered universal in the modern era of Spring.
Don't mix up the word of sex and gender.
Please check each definition in your English dictionary!
We checked our definitions in The Economist's Style Book: "The primary use of gender is in grammar, where it is applied to words, not people. If someone is female, that is her sex, not her gender."
Indeed, in English the genders of the pronouns correlate with the sexes but this isn't the case in every language. Gender is simply type. It's quite annoying when misinformed prudes use gender over sex, it's almost as bad as when people write things such as "please send it to John and myself". The number of adults who are guilty of poor grammar because they pontificate and won't accept a simple word is ridiculous. Back to school!
Increasingly gender is used to refer more to identity and social aspects (as well as grammar), while sex refers to physiology. This distinction is clearest when considering trangender and intersex people, but it applies to everyone. In sport the question of whether sex or gender is the relevant concept is a tricky one - especially because biological sex is not necessarily as straightforward as one might imagine.
women can hold up half the sky.
We have women vs women tug-of-war teams, and we have mixed teams for charity and fun events.
Bring back the Tug-of-war as an Olympic event!
Except for a few strength sports, fat peoples are probably left out of the Olympics games.
I like to propose a new game for the Olympic and should only be played by man of a certain type. It is an old game but certainly is a popular sport among our 1% elite. The team must wear shining shoes, pin strip suits, broad ties and golden cuff links. It is called "kick the can down the road."
Why don't The Economist do another gender statistic?
Which countries have their female athletes/teams winning more Olympic medals than their male counterparts?
China,meybe.
Motor boating? Really? Maybe that's how Beckham's getting in this year?
*Real* tennis... HAHAHAHAHA!!! Wonderful.
and devotee's actually call themselves 'realists'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_tennis
I was curious about the 1920 peak and subsequent normalization.
It was due to the introduction of Winter Olympic Events at Antwerp the games that spanned 5 months from Spring to Fall.
Afterwards in 1924, the Winter Olympics were partitioned off to a separate Winter Olympic Host City and the summer medal tally dropped off.
_____________________________
But I do not see the cause of the peak at 1908. Possibly it was due to English expansionism of Olympic Events into winter sports like figure skating and modern sports like motorboating and lost sports like Rackets and Jeu de paume.
This was followed in 1912 by event deletions by the dour Swedes in part because of self interest of preserving the winter Nordic Games.
Why is it an intrinsically good thing for the number of women’s events in the Olympic Games to be increased? The Olympics was, and still is, intended as an exhibition of the very best of human athleticism. However, it is one thing to rank among the world’s best athletes, another to just be one of the best female athletes. If that were not the case, there would be no justification for having separate, but identical, events for men and women. Gender is an obvious way of dividing humanity, but not the only one. We could also do it by race, size, age etc. Nobody thinks it unreasonable that old people don’t have their own special events in the Olympics.
Real sexual equality in the Olympics entails having all events open to everyone without regard to gender.
I'm all for more mixed events (especially team events like football) but I think mixed athletics and swimming (for example) would be pretty pointless.
The Olympics is just a hotchpotch of sports people don't care enough to pay for. To the extent that people do care enough to pay for a certain sport, those sports don't need the Olympics. Its nothing more than elitist scam of taxpayers posing as high-minded idealism.