WRITERS for The World in 2009 are encouraged to stick their neck out and make bold predictions. This our Brussels correspondent did in predicting the death of the European Union's Lisbon treaty, which Irish voters rejected in a referendum last June and which needs ratification by all 27 EU member states to enter into force. As our man bravely wrote:
The Lisbon treaty is dead, at least in its current form, and in 2009 its fans will at last come to terms with that fact. Expect some desperate attempts to get it ratified: there will be more pressure on Ireland to hold a second referendum on Lisbon in 2009, and a deep recession might just scare the Irish to fall into line. More likely, when it becomes clear that a fresh vote would lead to another rejection, several countries will demand that the Irish government find some legal wheeze for ratifying the treaty through parliament, removing the need for another referendum. But for the Irish government, bypassing voters like that would be legally risky. It would also be political suicide.
Yet the Lisbon treaty is showing signs of life again. At the recent European summit the Irish government promised to hold a new referendum, in which (so the treaty's fans hope) the Irish, swayed by various reassurances on key concerns, will this time vote Yes.
Charles Grant, who heads the Centre for European Reform, a think-tank, reckons it is "more likely than not that we'll have a Lisbon treaty". If so, he says, the EU will be able to get on with serious issues instead of fretting about its own internal workings.
The Irish will probably vote in September or October. With the Irish economy facing a dreadful year, voters may be in a mood to reject anything the politicians present to them—or they may be worried enough to accept the teaty after all.



Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
This article is just another page of wishful thinking by the British, conservative, Eurosceptic writers of the Economist.
To Frankineus:In 2007, 2 years after the French rejected the European Constitution, Nicolas Sarkozy campainged for president, claiming he would support a treaty equivalent to the constitution. He was elected President with 53% of votes, and 2 months later his party got an absolute majority in Parliament.Then he helped make a new treaty, taking into account some issues raised by the naysayers.End of story. The no-voters have nothing to say.
"The Irish will probably vote in September or October. With the Irish economy facing a dreadful year, voters may be in a mood to reject anything the politicians present to them—or they may be worried enough to accept the teaty after all."
..honestly, only a fool could call the up-coming referendum on Lisbon in Ireland, and as for the economy ...
... only Charlie McCreevy coming back from Brussels, to try some more free-market galavanting, could accelerate the freefall
"But for the Irish government, bypassing voters like that would be legally risky. It would also be political suicide." Didn't stop the Dutch or French governments.
Things always get worse, better they get better: enantiodromia! So, we're still in for a long period of 'down,' before the 'up' begins in 2012!