ON THURSDAY morning al-Qazzaz, a southern suburb of the Syrian capital, Damascus, was shaken by two explosions. The twin bombs exploded at rush hour, damaging the building of one of the most feared of Syria's 17-odd security agencies, leaving craters in the street and turning cars in twisted metal cages.
The bombs seem planned to inflict the maximum casualties possible. The first explosion, a small one in the early morning rush hour, drew a crowd of people. It was followed by a second massive blast that reverberated across the city. State television, though not the most reliable source, said that at least 55 people were killed and almost 400 injured. Witnesses at the scene describe bodies scattered amid the destruction. These are not the first explosions to hit Damascus—in fact bombs have become a regular occurrence—but the second blast today was the biggest yet. Many security buildings in the centre of the capital are already cordoned off and protected by concrete barriers and sandbags.
It is impossible to know who is behind the explosions. Opposition figures and many Syrians believe them to be the work of the government, pointing out how quickly state television's cameramen were at the scene. The Syrian government blames "terrorists", a byword for the opposition. Others, who say that few have the expertise to denote explosions this large, point to jihadi groups. Jabhat al-Nusra (the Salvation Front), a group which has claimed responsiblity for previous bombings in recent months, is one possibility.
The UN now has 70 observers in Syria but their work has been hampered by the deteriorating security situation. Security forces are increasingly turning their attention to peaceful activists in the capital as well as attacking smaller villages and towns that off the UN monitors' radar. Worryingly for Syrians looking to outsiders for help, the latest attacks could prompt the few remaining European embassies in the capital to rethink their presence.



Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
Remember when Muslim extremists bombed the UN HQ in Baghdad, killing hundreds of people? A civil war between Sunni and Shia factions ensued. The purpose of the bombings in Syria is to also to sow teror and confusion and create a civil war in so that a Muslim Caliphate will emerge there as they tried in Iraq. Tribal groups in Iraq turned against the extremists, aided by the surge in American troops. The difference in Syria is that there are no American troops on the ground to thwart the bloodshed, and there is little unity among Syrian opposition factions. So more bombings will ensue until there is an all-out civil war and/or half the population is killed. Bashir Assad is the same kind of cross-eyed mass murderer as his father Hafez. The only chance the opposition groups have is to get clandestine military aid from outside, but that does not appear to be happening as China and Russia oppose openly intervening. So many more civilians will die from government thugs and terrorist bombs. This is the legacy of despots and Islamic extremists who value the sanctity of human life at zero.
With the latest battles in Tripoli and Beirut, it seems the Syrian cross-sectarian civil war crosses now crosses the border into Lebanon.
Not so many pleasant bloomings in this 'Arab Spring', isn't it?
Who's next? - Jordan?
"The latest attacks could prompt the few remaining European embassies in the capital to rethink their presence".
I thought that all consulates of European countries were cleared by now but aparently a few Eastern European countries still keep ambassadors, unawares of the major force situation!
"Others, who say that few have the expertise to denote explosions this large, point to jihadi groups."
Should it be "detonate explosions"? Denote means to mark, or something along those lines.
The war isn't merely a war between Syrians; it is a war that takes place in Syria.
The Shiite - Sunni armed conflict had started. It is the Shiite Iranians, Shiite Hezbollah, and the Shia allies the Alawites vs. the Sunni Saudis, Suni Turks, Suni Syrians, Suni Qataris.
It is a winner-takes-it-all kind of war among the Syrians, and a war of domination between the Shiites and the Sunnis.
We're a long way before this blood bath ends.
Who cares 'who did it'?
The fact is … it happened. What does it mean? Only that things are getting more chaotic … more outta control … closer to the day Assad/Alawites retire to their stronghold for the final stand! Don't be mistaken into believing the war is over … or close to being over. As long as there's bullets (Russian) in the magazine and bodies able to shoot (meaning … $$$ to pay the troops) … the fight will go on and on and on … and …
This is a 'medieval' blood feud … it will not be pretty! How many are already dead? Is anyone counting? Nah I didn't think so … the TV reports of 7000 or 8000 are YESTERDAYS NEWS!
As I believe !00,000 will be dead before the end of this bloodbath! Yah that's right … 100K
Arab blood spilt by fellow Arabs … hmm
And we haven't even heard about the WMD's … the chemical and biological weapons … hmm
Yes the Saudis/Qataris have a hand in supplying $$$ to the 'terrorists' … but then again they love supplying $$$ to terrorists! The hands of Russia/Iran/Hezbollah are DIRTY as well.
Look the only POV is to be cynical … this rat-infested regime was a POLICE THUG STATE for 40 years and …
NO ONE MADE A PEEP SAYING SO … What gives? How come?
Oh ya that's right … they were fighting the Zionist entity … so they got a pass!
LET THERE BE BLOOD!
Frankly tzatz, your casual enthusiasm for "100K dead" is creepy.
Are you wrong? Offhand, not very. But it's still creepy.
As far as 'casual enthusiasm' … I'm neither thrilled nor happy about it … but I 'feel' it's the truth!
The Syrian regime is not friendly towards Israel or the Jewish People … they have persecuted the Jews of Syria and it was a heroine … Judy Feld Carr … from my hometown … Toronto … who bravely and quietly enabled Syrian Jewry to escape the clutches of this thuggish Syrian Regime! (And I'm not talking about the Assad dictatorship only!)
I don't wish the Syrian People anything positive … [I'll wait for a light to come on before taking back my words of derision.]
Until then … I'll go by the motto … 'Don't unto others …' Since the Syrian have done … that's what they'll receive … my curses and continued derision
"LET THERE BE BLOOD!"
"...my hometown... Toronto."
A bloodthirsty Canadian. Will wonders never cease?
"Oh ya that's right … they were fighting the Zionist entity … so they got a pass!"
So why would they be revolting now; Assad is still spitting the same anti israeli rhetoric?
If anyone other than the regime itself had done this, I would expect the opposition to be loudly proclaiming their ability to strike so strongly at the heart of the regime (whether they were really the ones who planned and carried it out or not). Rather than insisting that they didn't do it.
On the other hand, the regime would have to be getting pretty desperate to do this to itself.
Which would tend to suggest that Assad may be a lot closer to falling than has been obvious from the outside.
Come on, to blame the opposition for staged atrocities is a usual practice of any rebels.
.
Especially of rebels who dream about gullible Westerners coming to their help in the name of fairness and humanity. The Libyan scenario remake follows: butchering away the former ruling tribe or sect or both at will.
If it were merely an attrocity, I'd be inclined to agree with you.
But taking out a major Security building? Even with collateral damage, that wouldn't be hard to defend as an attack on a legitimate target.
Of course, it is at least concievable that the deed was done by non-Syrian actors outside the rebel movement itself. (I have seen at least rumors of Saudis infiltrating, whether officially sponsored or not.) But that's a rather different thing from the rebels doing it.
You think one of the sides in this... plurilateral civil war is more morally restricted than others? Don't deceive yourself.
.
The so called rebels aren't in habit to be finicky when choosing allies, so if Saudis are infiltrating on their behalf, they are doing it not just with consent, but to cheerful welcome.
.
Remember how a wing of the Romanian Communist Party staged "uprising" against Chaushesku and paraded cadavers from hospital morgues in front of the cameras to incriminate the regime?
.
Yeah, the objective was good, and the old tyrant wasn't more savoury creature than Boy Assad, but still...
Syria is hardly Black and White. The House of Saud has been trying to slice Bashar so as to better grab Khamenei's Beard and lets not forget that once the Fundamentalist Genie is let out of the Bottle, it ends up trying to bring down our Sky Scrapers.
Aly-Khan Satchu
http://www.rich.co.ke
History folks, history...
Some of us remember what happened when Reagan put troops in Lebanon.
NPWFTL
Regards
Agree. It is usually a bad idea to get involved in someone else's civil war.