MORE than 285m people across the globe suffer from visual impairment. Yet the tools to assist the blind in walking have changed little since the 1920s, when their canes started being painted white to make other pedestrians more aware of their presence. The gizmos that do exist have tended to be expensive and clunky, and have not caught on. This may change if Anirudh Sharma, a 24-year-old computer engineer from Hyderabad, a city in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh, has his way.
His innovation, dubbed “Le Chal” ("take me along" in Hindi) pairs a smartphone app with a small actuator sewn inside the sole of one shoe via Bluetooth. The user tells the phone his desired destination, which is translated into electronic commands using voice-recognition software. The app, which can be programmed to run in the background, fetches the local map of the area. The phone’s Global Positioning System (GPS) tracks the person’s location in real-time, telling the actuator to vibrate when it is time to turn. The side of the shoe where the vibration is felt indicates which way to go. Mr Sharma opted for a vibrating signal because for the blind, who rely on their sense of hearing to make sense of the environment, audio feedback is a distraction.
The system does not require constant internet access. Once downloaded, maps can be stored locally and combined with GPS data. The app uses Open Street Maps (OSM), an open-source rival to Google Maps. OSM allows editing, a helpful feature in updating rapidly changing urban landscapes. A speed-dial function can rapidly retrieve the most frequently visited routes.
The shoe pod is also equipped with an obstacle-detection mechanism. A sensor in the tip of the shoe, devised by Mr Sharma’s business partner, Krispian Lawrence, scans the vicinity using sonar, which emits ultrasounds that bounce off obstacles, indicating their presence. The shoe sets off a distinct pattern of vibrations to alert the person of any obstruction and guides him around it.
For now, the footwear, being tested at the L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, one of India’s biggest eye-health facilities, may be most useful in areas with little or no traffic, such as quiet residential streets or parks. The challenge, Mr Lawrence says, is to get the algorithm to tell an uncovered manhole from a flight of stairs, but he expects it to be able to do so in due course. Dealing with moving obstacles like cars may take longer, though the pair are working on ways to alert wearers not just about cars' presence, but also their speed.
To ensure that the final product resembles a regular shoe, fashion technologists are being consulted to help with ergonomics and design. Mr Sharma and Mr Lawrence, who started a company called Ducere Technologies to commercialise their idea, say their high-tech brogues should not cost more than an ordinary, stylish pair. Many of the world's visually impaired will like the sound of that.



Readers' comments
The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.
Sort:
Oh! The fruits of technology. All this and more will of course become quite commonplace in the days and years ahead.
Brilliant!!
Interesting article - thanks for posting it.
Readers may be interested to know that this innovation is one of whole category of products that are being created to provide people with different types of disability with more independence and lifestyle options - see my blog on 'Beyond Inclusion' at: http://www.hassellinclusion.com/2011/10/beyond-inclusion-and-reverse-inc...
I'm creating another example of these 'Beyond Inclusion' products - uKinect, which uses the Microsoft Kinect to help people who use sign language to communicate with those who don't understand signing - see my deck at: http://www.slideshare.net/jonathanhassell/ukinect-the-signed-internet-ge...
And, to pick up on Dylan Callow's point - yes, these products can often have uses beyond the disabled groups that they are designed for. Products as diverse as the typewriter and Siri have had their foundations in technologies designed to help disabled people - something I call 'reverse inclusion'. For more examples, check out: http://www.slideshare.net/jonathanhassell/mobile-apps-opportunities-and-...
Sounds like a fantastic idea, if it can be made to work, and is a great example of how technology like this will change the life of many.
I like that they made it buzz, so as not to distract from audio input. The article mentions that the developers wish to make it measure the speed of moving cars. Wouldn't this be better measured by the person themselves through audio input? I think there's a balance between what the device will tell the wearer and what the person should pick up themselves. What if the device indicates something different to auido senses?
As another person comments, would also be great for those with questionable sense of direction. But such dependence on technology will diminish sense of direction and lead to over-reliance. Though, I guess you could say that about a lot of technology.
Sounds like a great idea.
But it doesn't need to be in the shoe. Seems more practical to have the actuator on a simple wrist band instead of sewn into a shoe where it's more likely to get damaged or wet.
Also, the "obstacle-detection mechanism" could be made as a pair of glasses, so the wearer could turn their head to detect what is around them as well.
Hope the system get's out there soon. good luck to them.
Adding a small sonar sensor in the stick may also be a good idea so that the user can get a better idea of next immediate surroundings on the floor (like steps, water, etc.) by moving the stick a little bit.
I wonder if "Do Not Track" will be the default setting? Seems pretty unethical to make a blind person "read the fine print" before utilizing this technology.
This could be marketed to not only blind people, but also the directionally challenged!
Blind persons are more dependent on their social network by necessity. They have to coordinate plans with friends--it is hard to go solo in a city for safety reasons...much like being female rather than male. Or rely on strangers to find a restroom or a vending machine.
And unlike many of us they talk to strangers. And make requests. And ask for help.
...And they have learned by far, strangers are kind and helpful.
And the blind have to exist out of their comfort zone. And learn to make quick friendships, remember names, and cultivate friendships. The blind have to compensate by being extra-social and extroverted.....which is something we could all use.
They tend to have larger REAL social networks and more friends than normal sighted persons. And their blindness blinds them to superficial things as visual attractiveness, age, deformities, & social class and instead by necessity focusing on important things like personality, generosity and kindness--things that only deepen friendships.
Independence is a double edged sword. You can have a more independent, isolated and sterile existence and not know your neighbors-- like all the other alienated citizens in a vast cold city.
Blindness makes you dependent. But friendships and dependency can compensate with a richer life.
The blind have far lower rates of divorce than the deaf or normal sighted.
___________________________________________
The bigger tragedy is cities of normal people--blind and deaf and oblivious as they are stooped over their gadgets and smartphones--isolated, alone and friendless. Afraid to talk to the human next to them. Paranoid about strangers.
Technology is a mixed blessing. Computers have promoted social networking with virtual 'friends'. Yet gadgets have definitely made us more antisocial in our everyday interactions.
People with sight do not necessarily have vision.
My grandmother was blind and I recognise the points you make but I don't know if you think this development is a good thing or not.
What has this got to do with the price of fish? Or the development in this case.
The word "may" in the last sentence of the 1st paragraph is immensely wishful thinking.
Definitely a glass half empty man