Our cookies policy has changed. Review our cookies information for more details. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Our cookies policy has changed. Review our cookies information for more details. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Our cookies policy has changed. Review our cookies information for more details. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Our cookies policy has changed. Review our cookies information for more details. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Our cookies policy has changed. Review our cookies information for more details. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Our cookies policy has changed. Review our cookies information for more details. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Our cookies policy has changed. Review our cookies information for more details. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Our cookies policy has changed. Review our cookies information for more details. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Australia’s fiscal reform

Tithes of discontent

The political dangers of taxing carbon and mining

See article

Readers' comments

Reader comments are listed below. Comments are currently closed and new comments are no longer being accepted.

Sort:

Charel

There is always a risk in doing the right thing, but to vote for the opposition is the bigger risk.

Jintelo

Of caorse in the absence of an interanional agreement a carbon tax is functionally useless and nothing more than sadism,

csning2 in reply to diggerjock

Revenue from carbon pricing will be recycled back into tax cuts, reducing effective marginal tax rates and increasing incentives to work. Clearly it will not reduce competitiveness nor cost jobs.

diggerjock

I do not understand why the Economist should think that a carbon tax will not reduce Australia's competitiveness and cost jobs. Clearly it will do both.

hikeandski

A stupid tax levied on the basis of the IPCC theory "anthropogenic CO2 causes global warming" which is not proven. All that has been proven is that many lead IPCC researchers are liars, cheats and fraudsters. The Economissed should stop supporting this IPCC theory with their lying articles.

ash casey

Using the term 'carbon pricing' is misleading. Please correct this.

What is being taxed is Carbon DIOXIDE. Further, a 'price' or 'pricing scheme' is an amount voluntarily offered, paid or received for real goods or services. A TAX is a COMPULSORY Levy on production, consumption, income or expenditure.

Advertisement

Explore trending topics

Comments and tweets on popular topics

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
Sports rights: Fighting for possession
Game theory 42 mins ago
Rand Paul: Rand Paul's presidential chances
Lexington's notebook 2 hrs 21 mins ago
The global economy: Things could be better
Free exchange 2 hrs 57 mins ago

Advertisement

Products & events

Advertisement